Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

Which of the following was the result on appeal in Polkey v. Transtrecs Corp., the case in the text in which the employee sued after being fired for refusing to take a polygraph test?


A) That the employee had no cause of action under the Employee Polygraph Protection Act because of the employment-at-will doctrine and that the Employee Polygraph Protection Act only applied to federal government employees and members of Congress.
B) That the employee could not prevail under the Employee Polygraph Protection Act because her employer contracted with the government, and national security was involved.
C) That the employee could not prevail under the Employee Polygraph Protection Act because the employer instituted polygraph testing as part of an ongoing investigation.
D) Both that the employee could not prevail under the Employee Polygraph Protection Act because her employer instituted polygraph testing as part of an ongoing investigation and also because of national security issues involved with the employer's contract with the government.
E) That the employee could prevail under the Employee Polygraph Protection Act.

F) All of the above
G) D) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is provided to a plaintiff if the EEOC decides not to sue on behalf of the plaintiff?


A) A termination of claim letter
B) A reinstatement letter
C) A referral letter
D) A right-to-sue letter
E) None of these because if the EEOC decides not to sue, then the case has no merit; and a plaintiff may not bring a civil suit.

F) B) and E)
G) D) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following types of entities may be covered by Title VII?


A) Indian tribes
B) Private clubs
C) Unions
D) Employment agencies
E) All of these

F) C) and D)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is a federal law that sets minimum standards for most voluntarily established pension and health plans in private industry to provide protection for individuals in those plans?


A) The Employee Retirement Income Security Act
B) The Benefits Protection Act
C) The Family and Medical Leave Act
D) The Fair Labor Standards Act
E) Workers' compensation laws

F) A) and D)
G) B) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is true regarding whether employers may discriminate against smokers?


A) There is a federal law specifically prohibiting employers from firing employees who smoke.
B) There is a federal law specifically prohibiting employers from firing or from refusing to hire employees who smoke.
C) There is a federal law specifically prohibiting employers from firing employees who smoke and from refusing to hire employees who smoke, and it also requires that employers have a designated smoking area.
D) There is no federal law prohibiting employers from firing employees who smoke.
E) No states have laws prohibiting employers from firing employees who smoke.

F) C) and D)
G) B) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Overall, the percentage of unionized workers in the U.S. has declined since the post-World War II period.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following are employers required to provide to employees under ERISA containing information as to how their benefit plan operates, the benefits under the plan, how to apply for such benefits, and other information?


A) A summary plan description
B) A benefits glossary
C) An ERISA benefits guide
D) A complete plan explanation
E) A complete plan document

F) A) and D)
G) B) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In which of the following types of cases does a plaintiff attempt to prove that while an employer's policy or practice appears to apply to everyone equally, its actual effect is that it disproportionately limits employment opportunities for a protected class?


A) Disparate-treatment cases
B) Disparate-impact cases
C) Unequal-distribution harassment cases
D) Disparate-treatment cases, disparate-impact cases, and unequal-distribution cases.
E) Disparate-treatment cases and disparate-impact cases, but not unequal-distribution cases

F) A) and C)
G) B) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is also known as the Labor-Management Relations Act?


A) The Taft-Hartley Act
B) The National Labor Relations Board
C) The Fair Labor Standards Act
D) The Wagner Act
E) The Landrum-Griffin Act

F) B) and C)
G) C) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following primarily governs the internal operations of labor unions?


A) The Taft-Hartley Act
B) The National Labor Relations Board
C) The Fair Labor Standards Act
D) The Wagner Act
E) The Landrum-Griffin Act

F) A) and D)
G) B) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Reference - Surprise Arrival. Gracie was surprised and pleased to find she was pregnant. She worked as a waitress at Good Food and was aware that Groucho, her employer, had allowed employees who were ill for reasons that were not work related to take paid time off. For example, her friend Craig was off with pay for two months after suffering a mild heart attack, and her friend Bonnie was off of work for three months when she ran her personal watercraft into a dock and broke her leg. Gracie told her employer Groucho about her pregnancy. He very angrily told her that pregnancy was completely voluntary, that he was not paying her a dime when she was off work, and that she would be lucky if he even allowed her to continue working at all because she would not be as cute when she gained weight. He also said that he serves families, and he does not want the kids to ask embarrassing questions of their parents regarding Gracie's condition. Gracie was very angry and threatened to sue. Groucho told her, however, that he had business law back in 1980 and that discrimination based on pregnancy is not even covered by Title VII. The employee handbook did not address the issue. What will be the likely result if Groucho defends on the basis that customers will object to Gracie's condition?


A) If he can prove that is true, then Groucho will prevail on the defense of bona fide occupational qualification.
B) Groucho will only prevail on a defense of bona fide occupational qualification if he can establish that he has an established history of barring pregnant servers and that he did not single out Gracie.
C) Groucho will only prevail on a defense of bona fide occupational qualification if he can establish that Gracie was attempting to voluntarily get pregnant.
D) Groucho will not prevail on a defense of bona fide occupational qualification because it is available in cases involving religion and national origin only.
E) Groucho will lose on a defense of bona fide occupational qualification because he will not be able to establish that only non-pregnant employees can perform as servers.

F) A) and E)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following are sometimes called unintentional-discrimination cases?


A) Disparate-treatment cases
B) Disparate-impact cases
C) Sexual harassment cases
D) Disparate-treatment cases, disparate-impact cases, and sexual harassment cases
E) Disparate-treatment cases and disparate-impact cases, but not sexual harassment cases

F) B) and E)
G) B) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The Taft-Hartley Act was passed to further strengthen restrictions on employers regarding unionization.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is false under the Federal Unemployment Tax Act?


A) It provides a federal system to provide unemployment compensation to qualified employees who lose their jobs.
B) Employers must pay taxes to the states which deposit the money into the federal government's Unemployment Insurance Fund.
C) Each state has an account from which it can access the money in the federal fund.
D) States have different minimum standards for qualifying for unemployment compensation.
E) Almost all states require that an applicant for unemployment compensation not quit the former job.

F) None of the above
G) All of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Discuss whether you ethically believe employment-at-will should be retained in the U.S. and whether you believe laws currently in place excessively restrict employers insofar as their ability to fire employees is concerned. In your answer specifically reference at least three federal laws impacting the employment-at-will doctrine and whether you believe the laws are needed and appropriate.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Student re...

View Answer

Reference - Multiplication. Phyllis, who is 30 years old, works for We Add for You Accounting. Phyllis has worked there for a number of years and is considering quitting in order to spend more time with her three active triplets, Sunny, Fussy, and Perky. She asks her boss, Bolivar, about the pension plan at We Add for You. Her boss tells her that she has no entitlement to information until she is at least 60 years old. Phyllis also asks about retaining her medical insurance protection if she quits and is told that she would have no right to do so. Bolivar also throws in that he has been monitoring her conversations and that he particularly enjoys the conversations between her and her single female friends involving failed dating experiences. He asks her to keep those up. Phyllis tells him that her personal phone calls are none of his business. Bolivar says that he can listen if he wants because the phones are his. Phyllis ends up starting her own company called We Multiply for You, and makes much, much more money. (In answering the following questions, assume all federal laws apply and that any pension and medical plan qualifies for regulation under federal law.) Assuming Phyllis quits, which of the following rights does she have under federal law to retain benefits so long as the benefits are provided to employees who are still working?


A) None.
B) The right to retain the medical benefits indefinitely, so long as she pays for them along with the allowable administrative fee.
C) The right to retain the benefits for at least 12 months, with the cost born by the employer.
D) The right to retain the benefits for at least 18 months, with the cost born by the employer.
E) The right to retain the benefits for at least 18 months so long as she pays for the benefits along with the allowable administrative fee.

F) All of the above
G) C) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Reference - Styling Shenanigans. Candy, who operated a hair and nail salon called "Up Sweep," had a crush on Bruce, a stylist there. He paid her no attention. He paid her no attention. Finally, Candy told him that to get her approval of his new blow dryer request, he needs to take her on a date and give her a kiss. Bruce reluctantly did so. When they returned to work, Candy proceeded to make suggestive comments to Bruce in front of other employees and to request that he rub her shoulders. When she passed Bruce's station, she would caress him while he worked. Candy also decided that Robert was cute, and she showered him with the same type of attention. Robert enjoyed the attention, but Bruce was offended and filed a claim against Candy for sexual harassment. Bruce asked Robert to join in on the claim. Robert said that it personally never bothered him; but that if Bruce can collect, then he wants in on the action. Bruce told Robert that he is going to see a psychologist to substantiate his claim and that Robert should consider doing likewise. Robert tells him that he has no interest in seeing a psychologist but that his case is as strong as Bruce's. Robert says that while he found Candy entertaining, in all fairness, he should be able to recover if Bruce does so. Of which of the following types of harassment were Candy's caresses and suggestive statements?


A) Quid pro quo
B) Hostile work environment
C) Sexual annoyance
D) Quid pro quo, hostile work environment, and sexual annoyance
E) Quid pro quo and hostile work environment, but not sexual annoyance

F) B) and D)
G) C) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is the term for the concept that an employee may be fired for no reason at all?


A) Fire-at-will
B) Employment-at-will
C) No-reason-firing
D) Without-reason-firing
E) Unsupported discharge

F) B) and C)
G) A) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which of the following occurs when a plaintiff establishes a prima facie case in an action alleging disparate-treatment discrimination in employment in the form of an illegal discharge?


A) The plaintiff wins.
B) The burden shifts to the defendant to articulate a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for the discharge.
C) The burden shifts to the defendant to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that discrimination did not occur.
D) The burden remains with the plaintiff to prove discrimination beyond a reasonable doubt, a special standard in disparate-treatment cases.
E) The burden remains with the plaintiff to establish damages to a reasonable certainty.

F) B) and D)
G) C) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 61 - 79 of 79

Related Exams

Show Answer